Relationship between information absorption and sunk cost

Public.icon

When delivering content, the design of sunk cost and scope is important. I think that the more closed and paid the cost, the better it is absorbed, but the contact range is naturally narrow. If you deliver it widely, the number of people who read it will increase, but the absorption rate will be low, etc. Also, sunk costs can take various forms such as money and time.

It's tough to write for the story while thinking, "You don't need that many characters, do you?"

Whether it's a function or an emotion, it's difficult to determine the position of the content I array to the world because they are gradations.

I think there is a concept of putting sunk costs into resources, and it is very difficult to use them differently, such as meeting in person, talking on video, reading books, reading notes, reading Twitter, and using Line.

I wonder if I'm showing too much ego. To use it as a network that doesn't show personality and becomes a bot (I'm happy when I acquire it. Concise, short, resource-oriented, reference-oriented), it's difficult to allocate it to some extent without the context of the truck and the individual, and it's difficult to become a weapon in the real world. >Like a personal business card?

Emotions can be overwhelmingly resource-intensive.

I write various contents while thinking, "I'm talking to you!" without reaching the people who want to receive them...